Outsourcing vs. In-house development, which is better and practical?
For me, outsourcing is better and practical than in-house development. When it comes to money matters it really practical because outsourced project is cheaper than in-house project. The only disadvantage on it is that you can’t reach immediately the programmer. If their programs has bugs you can’t fixed it immediately because there are some restricted part maybe of their program that you cannot debug.
It is easy to maintain outsourced project but the big problem of it is the bugs. You can encounter several problems when in terms to it but i think their are terms and agreement to be followed by the user. As professional they must be honest to their client because in businesses that would be a big benefits to them. Now as we can see and hear, there are a lot of small companies using outsourced project. It is because the payment is net already compare to in-house development the payment is flexible. It can be lesser or it can be higher to the proposed project. In-house is good because you can do anything and debug anything on the said project but the problem is that it’s quite expensive. You should employ a programmer on the in-house. Compare to outsouced project you will just teach the user on what to do with the project. You don’t need any employee anymore. That is why outsourcing is better and practical compare to in-house development.
